![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() This study revealed that applying a piezoelectric scaler with 200 g of lateral force leaves smoother surfaces than a magnetostrictive device with the same lateral force.ĭental calculus Dental scaling Tooth extraction. Dental Ultrasonic Piezo Scaler Tip Holder with Cover 6H Block Stand fit EMS NSK Handpiece No reviews 1679 (9.52/Ounce) FREE delivery Thu, Apr 6 on 25 of items shipped by Amazon Or fastest delivery Tue, Apr 4 Only 19 left in stock - order soon. For root surface roughness, we only found a statistically significantly poorer result for the C200 group in comparison to the P200 group (P=0.033). The mean time needed for instrumentation for the piezoelectric and magnetostrictive devices was 50:54 and 41:10, respectively, but their difference was not statistically significant (P=0.171). Buy Ultrasonic Piezo Scaler UDS-l W/ Water Reservoir (Woodpecker) at Pearson Dental Supply for the Best Price, Highest Quality, Superior Customer Service. he teeth were scaled and the data on the duration of scaling and the amount of surface were collected and analyzed using the t-test. In the other two groups (P100 and P200), the teeth were scaled with a piezoelectric device with 100 g and 200 g of lateral force, respectively. In two groups (C100 and C200), the teeth were scaled using a magnetostrictive device and two different lateral forces: 100 g and 200 g, respectively. This study aimed to compare the results of scaling using magnetostrictive and piezoelectric devices on extracted teeth.įorty-four human extracted teeth were assigned to four study groups (n=11). are paired with piezoelectric ultrasonic scaling units to remove calculus, plaque and more that build up on and around a patients. The effects of magnetostrictive and piezoelectric devices on tooth surfaces seem to differ with regard to the root surface roughness they produce. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |